No peace in sight
The Chinese have invested perhaps a trillion dollars in building up the infrastructure for the one belt, one road that basically is designed to connect everyone on the Eurasian continent and Africa back to China and vice versa. In other words, a new commercial structure beyond anything that was conceived of under the Mongolian Empire in terms of commercial ties between east and west. Something beyond anything we've seen certainly since the end of the second world war that promises to create enormous prosperity all over Eurasia and potentially Africa in time and we are treating that as catastrophic something has to be resisted something has to be broken because we are not in charge of it it's not our idea we didn't think of it and we utterly refuse to be part of anything that we do not dominate.
Ursula von der Leyen is the captain of the Titanic. The EU is finished as an organization. So is NATO for that matter. But the EU is probably going to go under first. It's about as popular as the plague. It was supposed to be an an institution that would facilitate trade and crossber travel and so forth, and it became effectively an unelected dictatorship in which decisions would be made on how everyone in Europe would live in a uniform manner and behave in a uniform manner.
[. . .]
The bad news is that we don't seem to understand that this sinking ship cannot be writed. We can't fix it. They're deeply in debt. There is they're on the road into economic disaster just as we are. So, you put the whole picture together, it's worse than a clown show because some of these people are seriously delusional. They don't seem to understand they're not living in the world they think they live in. And that's where we are. I don't know how you fix this, because President Trump is right there with them. He's decided to hitch his boat to the sinking EU Titanic. What a waste of time.
[. . .]
If you're sitting in Brussels or Berlin or Paris or London and you objectively look at how money has been invested over the last 20 years, and I'm talking about money globally, you know that the Chinese have invested roughly a trillion dollars in this one belt, one road project. And this project is all about transportation, infrastructure, pipelines, trying to knit together in some reasonably organized and integrated fashion all the potential trading partners on the Eurasian landmass and Africa together. That's a trillion dollars. The United States alone has spent somewhere between 9 and 14 trillion dollars depending upon whom you want to refer to as as a source on what? On crushing Afghanistan, crushing Iraq, advancing into Syria, crushing Libya. In other words, we've wasted trillions and trillions on unprofitable wars of intervention that have brought us nothing but grief in Europe, nothing but a an invasion of people that they don't want and can't maintain.
[. . .] there is a US military command in Germany right now overseeing the entire conflict in Ukraine. They are at the very top the chain of command of Ukraine's armed forces. Not Ukrainian generals, American generals. If President Trump put an end to that, brought these generals back home or put them in charge of something that actually had to do with American national security, the war would end. It would end very quickly. Another factor fueling this war is the United States and its directive to the Europeans to continue funding and arming and training the Ukrainians. And also and again as the western media itself has admitted the United States Central Intelligence Agency is running Ukraine's intelligence networks inside Ukraine right now. That is another aspect of this war that if President Trump decided he could end overnight and the conflict would end. So he's not serious about ending this conflict.
